Topic summary
⁠10%1 analyzed article/video293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brunch results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 207 hits. Analysis detected 368 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (5,728 of 22,261 topics). This Brunch is worse (more manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Brunch
Topic details
Total words: 1,172
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.3% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.7%17.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.0%2.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.7%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos