Topic summary
18%1 analyzed article/video1,850 analyzed words
BS Summary: These British Foreign Policy results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 491 hits. Analysis detected 5,057 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (11,241 of 12,443 topics). This British Foreign Policy is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
British Foreign Policy
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
British Foreign Policy attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
British Foreign Policy vs sitewide
British Foreign Policy attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.