Topic summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video961 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Breast Cancer Awareness results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 366 hits. Analysis detected 1,720 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (14,081 of 24,402 topics). This Breast Cancer Awareness is better (less manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Breast Cancer Awareness
Topic details
Total words: 3,844
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510042.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos