Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Bird Conservation results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 338 hits. Analysis detected 3,005 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Bird Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Bird Conservation
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Bird Conservation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Bird Conservation vs sitewide
Bird Conservation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.