Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aviva Okeson Haberman results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 247 hits. Analysis detected 1,547 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,003 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 24% (9,894 of 13,023 topics). This Aviva Okeson Haberman is better (less manipulative) than 76.00% of the peer group.
Aviva Okeson Haberman
Topic details
Total words: 3,003
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Aviva Okeson Haberman attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Aviva Okeson Haberman vs sitewide
Aviva Okeson Haberman attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos