Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video428 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Auto Repair results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 858 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,712 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (8,955 of 23,071 topics). This Auto Repair is worse (more manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Auto Repair
Topic details
Total words: 1,712
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.2% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.1%7.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.0%2.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos