Topic summary
9%1 analyzed article/video1,295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attorney Discipline results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 1,704 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 12% (19,735 of 22,265 topics). This Attorney Discipline is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group.
Attorney Discipline
Topic details
Total words: 5,180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

11% percentile
025507510011.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos