Topic summary
â 15%1 analyzed article/video756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Appeals Courts results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 1,561 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of â 38% (13,407 of 21,486 topics). This Appeals Courts is better (less manipulative) than 62.40% of the peer group.
Appeals Courts
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Appeals Courts attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Appeals Courts vs sitewide
Appeals Courts attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.