Topic summary
6%1 analyzed article/video785 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Apollo 11 results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 256 hits. Analysis detected 887 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 18% (10,338 of 12,591 topics). This Apollo 11 is better (less manipulative) than 82.10% of the peer group.
Apollo 11
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Apollo 11 attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Apollo 11 vs sitewide
Apollo 11 attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.