Topic summary
â 5%1 analyzed article/video931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Animal Conservation results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.5% saturation with 167 hits. Analysis detected 1,095 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of â 8% (15,489 of 16,802 topics). This Animal Conservation is better (less manipulative) than 92.20% of the peer group.
Animal Conservation
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Animal Conservation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Animal Conservation vs sitewide
Animal Conservation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.