Topic summary
53%1 analyzed article/video931 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Safety And Security results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 193 hits. Analysis detected 1,415 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,793 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 57% (10,738 of 24,545 topics). This AI Safety And Security is worse (more manipulative) than 56.30% of the peer group.
AI Safety And Security
Topic details
Total words: 2,793
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

56% percentile
025507510056.3% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos