Topic summary
ā 50%1 analyzed article/video677 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI Risks results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 714 hits. Analysis detected 3,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,708 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ā 58% (5,169 of 12,140 topics). This AI Risks is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
AI Risks
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
ā 0%Holocaust1%
ā 0%Self-Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Self Driving Cars1%
ā 0%Survival Stories1%
ā 0%Gender Identity1%
ā 58%AI Risks (selected)4%
ā 100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
ā 100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
ā 100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,708
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
AI Risks attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
AI Risks vs sitewide
AI Risks attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos