Topic summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These AI In Science Communication results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 253 hits. Analysis detected 1,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (14,665 of 24,545 topics). This AI In Science Communication is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
AI In Science Communication
Topic details
Total words: 3,020
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

40% percentile
025507510040.3% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Middle Ground: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos