Topic summary

⁠93%1 analyzed article/video465 analyzed words

BS Summary: These AI In Legal Proceedings results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.6% saturation with 357 hits. Analysis detected 2,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,395 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (2,657 of 15,882 topics). This AI In Legal Proceedings is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.

AI In Legal Proceedings

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠84%	AI In Legal Proceedings (selected)	7%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 1,395

Article count: 1

Authors

Samantha Cole

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

AI In Legal Proceedings attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

AI In Legal Proceedings vs sitewide

AI In Legal Proceedings attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

A Stenographer Submitted AI-Generated Errors in Official Court Transcript, Judge Says⁠^78%

404 Media⁠^48%By Samantha Cole⁠^62%7/23/2026, 9:41:29 PM