Topic summary

⁠84%1 analyzed article/video805 analyzed words

BS Summary: These AI In Dating results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.3% saturation with 654 hits. Analysis detected 4,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (4,712 of 11,862 topics). This AI In Dating is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group.

AI In Dating

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Self-Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Self Driving Cars	1%
⁠0%	Youth Soccer	1%
⁠0%	Immigrant Experience	1%
⁠61%	AI In Dating (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 3,220

Article count: 1

Authors

Stephen Johnson

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

AI In Dating attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

AI In Dating vs All Other Publications

AI In Dating attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

The Out-of-Touch Adults' Guide to Kid Culture: Why Ditto AI Might Be the New Tinder⁠^64%

Lifehacker⁠^63%By Stephen Johnson⁠^60%7/14/2026, 12:30:00 PM