Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,861 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Agricultural Research Funding results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 792 hits. Analysis detected 5,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (9,610 of 13,154 topics). This Agricultural Research Funding is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Agricultural Research Funding
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Agricultural Research Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Agricultural Research Funding vs sitewide
Agricultural Research Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.