Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Agencia De Protección Ambiental (epa) results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 511 hits. Analysis detected 593 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,164 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,345 topics). This Agencia De Protección Ambiental (epa) is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Agencia De Protección Ambiental (epa)
Topic details
Total words: 3,164
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.1%16.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos