Topic summary

⁠91%1 analyzed article/video734 analyzed words

BS Summary: These Advisory Council For Historic Preservation results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Anecdotal, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 375 hits. Analysis detected 2,433 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,202 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,582 of 16,562 topics). This Advisory Council For Historic Preservation is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.

Advisory Council For Historic Preservation

Topic ranking list

Percentile	Topic	BS Score
⁠0%	Uber	1%
⁠0%	Pittsburgh Pirates	1%
⁠0%	Opera	1%
⁠0%	Holocaust	1%
⁠0%	Privacy Policy	1%
⁠67%	Advisory Council For Historic Preservation (selected)	4%
⁠100%	Radio Roundup / Week In Review	60%
⁠100%	E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	E Bikes Rad Power Bikes	60%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell	69%
⁠100%	The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell	69%

Topic details

Total words: 2,202

Article count: 1

Authors

Stephanie Riegel

Loading chart...

Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)

Advisory Council For Historic Preservation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.

Loading chart...

Advisory Council For Historic Preservation vs sitewide

Advisory Council For Historic Preservation attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos

Sort by

New Orleans preservationists fear major changes to national law protecting historic sites⁠^74%

NOLA.com⁠^8%By Stephanie Riegel⁠^52%7/25/2026, 2:00:00 AM