Topic summary
97%1 analyzed article/video331 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Action Cameras results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Negativity Bias, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 293 hits. Analysis detected 1,594 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,324 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.1% and a BS Rank of 91% (2,358 of 24,545 topics). This Action Cameras is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Action Cameras
Topic details
Total words: 1,324
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.4% percentile
7.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.5%17.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 22.1%22.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.5%8.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 16.8%16.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.5%, sitewide 0.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos