Topic summary
63%1 analyzed article/video1,520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Access To Justice results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 3,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,560 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 40% (8,204 of 13,587 topics). This Access To Justice is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Access To Justice
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Access To Justice attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Access To Justice vs sitewide
Access To Justice attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.