Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video761 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Accelerator Program results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 2,600 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,044 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 38% (8,101 of 13,018 topics). This Accelerator Program is better (less manipulative) than 62.20% of the peer group.
Accelerator Program
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Accelerator Program attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Accelerator Program vs sitewide
Accelerator Program attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.