Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Academic Symposium results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Negativity Bias, and Anecdotal, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 4.1% saturation with 199 hits. Analysis detected 1,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 4% (12,566 of 13,018 topics). This Academic Symposium is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Academic Symposium
Topic details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Academic Symposium attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Academic Symposium vs sitewide
Academic Symposium attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.