Topic summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abenaki History results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and In-Group Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 264 hits. Analysis detected 1,727 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (11,008 of 22,261 topics). This Abenaki History is worse (more manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group.
Abenaki History
Topic details
Total words: 2,456
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.8%10.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%No True Scotsman: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos