Topic summary
⁠82%2 analyzed articles/videos1,161 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aaron Rodgers results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 323 hits. Analysis detected 3,262 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,970 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (12,311 of 23,583 topics). This Aaron Rodgers is better (less manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Aaron Rodgers
Topic details
Total words: 3,970
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510047.8% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.1%8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.0%8.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos