Speaker summary
73%1 analyzed article/video280.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Zanoni results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Begging the Question, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 730.982 faulty-reasoning hits from 280.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (15,542 of 18,479 speakers). This Peter Zanoni is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.