Author summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video1,618 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chuck Lindell results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 3,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (4,134 of 4,737 authors). This Chuck Lindell is better (less manipulative) than 87.30% of the peer group.
Chuck Lindell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠0%Levi Sumagaysay1%
⁠0%Talmon Joseph Smith1%
⁠1%Joe Rennison1%
⁠1%Jason Karaian1%
⁠13%Chuck Lindell (selected)2%
⁠100%Daniel Arkin38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,472
Article count: 1
Publications
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Chuck Lindell attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Chuck Lindell vs All Other Publications
Chuck Lindell attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos