Publication summary
51%2 analyzed articles/videos641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orlando Weekly results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 422 hits. Analysis detected 1,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,872 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 64% (169 of 462 publications). This Orlando Weekly is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Publication details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Orlando Weekly attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Orlando Weekly vs sitewide
Orlando Weekly attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.