Publication summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These WSAW results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 364 hits. Analysis detected 3,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 299 publications). This WSAW is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
WSAW
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%San Francisco Chronicle1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%Houston Chronicle1%
⁠2%The Colorado Sun1%
⁠99%Decatur Daily9%
⁠99%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
⁠0%WSAW (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 4,372
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
WSAW attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
WSAW vs sitewide
WSAW attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos