Publication summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Honolulu Star-Advertiser results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 409 hits. Analysis detected 2,604 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,049 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 302 publications). This Honolulu Star-Advertiser is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Honolulu Star-Advertiser
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%The Oaklandside1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠1%Houston Public Media1%
⁠2%The Colorado Sun1%
⁠99%Decatur Daily9%
⁠99%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
⁠0%Honolulu Star-Advertiser (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 2,049
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Honolulu Star-Advertiser attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Honolulu Star-Advertiser vs sitewide
Honolulu Star-Advertiser attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos