Publication summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video584 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beijing Bulletin results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 581 hits. Analysis detected 3,030 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,752 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (15 of 366 publications). This Beijing Bulletin is worse (more manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Beijing Bulletin
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
⁠0%Brookings1%
⁠1%FactCheck.org1%
⁠1%Berkeleyside1%
⁠1%@politifact1%
⁠2%Tampa Bay Times1%
⁠97%Beijing Bulletin (selected)6%
⁠99%The White House9%
⁠100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
⁠100%MS NOW Live Events26%
⁠100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
⁠100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
Publication details
Total words: 1,752
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Beijing Bulletin attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Beijing Bulletin vs sitewide
Beijing Bulletin attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos