Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video107 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yomiuri Giants results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anecdotal, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 212 faulty-reasoning hits from 428 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 79% (6,196 of 29,241 keywords). This Yomiuri Giants is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Yomiuri Giants
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Yomiuri Giants attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Yomiuri Giants vs sitewide
Yomiuri Giants attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.