Keyword summary
⁠16%1 analyzed article/video699 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wisconsin Elections Commission results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 239 hits. Analysis detected 1,799 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,796 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (15,887 of 27,379 keywords). This Wisconsin Elections Commission is better (less manipulative) than 58.00% of the peer group.
Wisconsin Elections Commission
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠42%Wisconsin Elections Commission (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,796
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wisconsin Elections Commission attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wisconsin Elections Commission vs sitewide
Wisconsin Elections Commission attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos