Keyword summary
66%1 analyzed article/video3,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildlife Funding results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 940 hits. Analysis detected 7,894 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,119 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (22,392 of 26,634 keywords). This Wildlife Funding is better (less manipulative) than 84.10% of the peer group.
Wildlife Funding
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wildlife Funding attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wildlife Funding vs sitewide
Wildlife Funding attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.