Keyword summary
⁠3%1 analyzed article/video2,706 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wildfire Science results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 2.6% saturation with 281 hits. Analysis detected 3,156 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,824 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (41,690 of 41,908 keywords). This Wildfire Science is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group.
Wildfire Science
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Wyomings Big Show1%
⁠0%Wyoming's Big Show1%
⁠0%Sweetwater Events Complex1%
⁠0%Ffa1%
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠1%Wildfire Science (selected)1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,824
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Wildfire Science attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Wildfire Science vs sitewide
Wildfire Science attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos