Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Historical Association results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Anecdotal, and Ad Hominem, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 1,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,892 of 37,536 keywords). This White House Historical Association is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
White House Historical Association
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
White House Historical Association attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
White House Historical Association vs sitewide
White House Historical Association attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.