Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video595 analyzed words
BS Summary: These White House Historical Association results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Anecdotal, and Ad Hominem, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 189 hits. Analysis detected 1,134 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (24,892 of 37,536 keywords). This White House Historical Association is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
White House Historical Association
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 2,380
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
White House Historical Association attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
White House Historical Association vs sitewide
White House Historical Association attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos