Keyword summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,551 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Supreme Court results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 622 hits. Analysis detected 6,379 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,298 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,757 of 29,076 keywords). This Washington Supreme Court is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Washington Supreme Court
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠19%Washington Supreme Court (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Washington Supreme Court attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Washington Supreme Court vs sitewide
Washington Supreme Court attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos