Keyword summary
0%6 analyzed articles/videos1,802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Debate Commission results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 1,403 hits. Analysis detected 12,747 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,752 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (24,686 of 28,615 keywords). This Utah Debate Commission is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Utah Debate Commission
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Utah Debate Commission attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Utah Debate Commission vs sitewide
Utah Debate Commission attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.