Keyword summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video1,171 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ut Austin Study results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 272 hits. Analysis detected 2,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,513 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (19,409 of 29,430 keywords). This Ut Austin Study is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Ut Austin Study
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠35%Ut Austin Study (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,513
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Ut Austin Study attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Ut Austin Study vs sitewide
Ut Austin Study attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos