Keyword summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video1,070 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Senate Debate results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 381 hits. Analysis detected 2,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,210 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠44% (16,496 of 29,242 keywords). This US Senate Debate is better (less manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
US Senate Debate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Borders1%
⁠0%French Revolution1%
⁠44%US Senate Debate (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,210
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
US Senate Debate attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
US Senate Debate vs sitewide
US Senate Debate attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos