Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,633 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Unruh Civil Rights Act results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 930 hits. Analysis detected 6,741 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,930 of 28,625 keywords). This Unruh Civil Rights Act is better (less manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group.
Unruh Civil Rights Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠41%Unruh Civil Rights Act (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,532
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Unruh Civil Rights Act attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Unruh Civil Rights Act vs sitewide
Unruh Civil Rights Act attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos