Keyword summary
56%2 analyzed articles/videos3,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Tennessee results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,243 hits. Analysis detected 8,961 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,866 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (22,424 of 29,303 keywords). This University Of Tennessee is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
University Of Tennessee
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
University Of Tennessee attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
University Of Tennessee vs sitewide
University Of Tennessee attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.