Keyword summary
⁠40%1 analyzed article/video1,788 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Chicago Study results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 464 hits. Analysis detected 3,605 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (25,000 of 33,509 keywords). This University Of Chicago Study is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group.
University Of Chicago Study
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Radio Broadcasts1%
⁠0%Metropolitan Opera1%
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠26%University Of Chicago Study (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,364
Article count: 1
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
University Of Chicago Study attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
University Of Chicago Study vs sitewide
University Of Chicago Study attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos