Keyword summary
88%1 analyzed article/video1,081 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Federal Energy Regulatory Commission results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 491 hits. Analysis detected 3,028 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,243 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,975 of 37,536 keywords). This U S Federal Energy Regulatory Commission is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
U S Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
U S Federal Energy Regulatory Commission attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
U S Federal Energy Regulatory Commission vs sitewide
U S Federal Energy Regulatory Commission attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.