BS Summary: These U S Chinese Relations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 989 hits. Analysis detected 7,364 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,800 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (18,064 of 22,929 keywords). This U S Chinese Relations is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
U S Chinese Relations
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
U S Chinese Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
U S Chinese Relations vs All Other Publications
U S Chinese Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.