BS Summary: These U S China Relations results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 3,037 hits. Analysis detected 18,837 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,120 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 63% (8,518 of 22,992 keywords). This U S China Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
U S China Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 12,120
Article count: 14
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
U S China Relations attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
U S China Relations vs All Other Publications
U S China Relations attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.