Keyword summary
69%1 analyzed article/video1,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Attorneys Office For The Northern District Of Ohio results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 562 hits. Analysis detected 2,553 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 66% (11,334 of 32,737 keywords). This U S Attorneys Office For The Northern District Of Ohio is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
U S Attorneys Office For The Northern District Of Ohio
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
U S Attorneys Office For The Northern District Of Ohio attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
U S Attorneys Office For The Northern District Of Ohio vs sitewide
U S Attorneys Office For The Northern District Of Ohio attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.