Keyword summary
95%8 analyzed articles/videos5,549 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tulsi Gabbard results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 3,211 hits. Analysis detected 37,356 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,441 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (11,444 of 28,017 keywords). This Tulsi Gabbard is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group.
Tulsi Gabbard
Keyword details
Total words: 23,441
Article count: 8
Authors
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Tulsi Gabbard attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Tulsi Gabbard vs sitewide
Tulsi Gabbard attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.