BS Summary: These Trump Defamation results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Appeal to Emotion, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,284 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 30% (16,329 of 23,285 keywords). This Trump Defamation is better (less manipulative) than 70.10% of the peer group.
Trump Defamation
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Trump Defamation attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Trump Defamation vs All Other Publications
Trump Defamation attribute percentages, with an overlaid baseline for all publications (Overall) for those same attributes.