Keyword summary
47%1 analyzed article/video1,100 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Umberg results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 520 hits. Analysis detected 3,270 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,400 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (19,433 of 27,017 keywords). This Tom Umberg is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group.
Tom Umberg
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Tom Umberg attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Tom Umberg vs sitewide
Tom Umberg attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.