Keyword summary
⁠75%5 analyzed articles/videos3,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tina Peters results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,559 hits. Analysis detected 14,186 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,070 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠47% (15,299 of 28,419 keywords). This Tina Peters is better (less manipulative) than 53.80% of the peer group.
Tina Peters
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Self-Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Self Driving Cars1%
⁠0%Bastille Day1%
⁠0%Anthony Broadwater1%
⁠0%Alice Sebold1%
⁠47%Tina Peters (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Loading chart...
Attribute Prevalence (Top 48)
Tina Peters attribute prevalence percentages (biases/fallacies), sorted highest to lowest.
Loading chart...
Tina Peters vs sitewide
Tina Peters attribute percentages, with an overlaid sitewide baseline for those same attributes.

Analyzed articles and videos